DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2480
BAN
Docket No. NRO1288-14
5 August 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction’ of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive gession, considered your application. on 4 Bugust
2014. Your allegations of error ana injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material
submitted in support thereof, your navai record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps {HOMC)
memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 of 23 Jan 2914, and HOMC memo 1400 RAP of 10 Jun
2014, copies of which were provided to you on 26 June 2014, and are
being provided to you now.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that tne evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinions. nocordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your casé are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Bnclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR070 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in wee ce New evidence ig evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6803 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by HQMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dated 13 February 2015 and HQMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dated 18 November 2014, copies of which are attached. NR6803-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3184 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, yegulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3828 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO3828-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1747 14
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 of 16 May 2014, a copy of which was previously provided to you and which is now enclosed. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5581 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NR0O5581-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2421 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. Docket No.NRO2421-14 New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying-for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the - existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR101 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0280 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9209 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dated 30 January 2015, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR9209-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.